|
Project Name |
Time to Care |
|
Project Location |
Kenya, Nairobi Nakuru Kiambu and Mombasa Counties |
|
Project period |
2023-2028 |
|
Work requested |
Midterm Review (MTR) Consultant |
|
Timeframe of MTR |
May 2026 – June2026 |
With Global Affairs Canada (GAC) funding, Oxfam, the Center for Domestic Training and Development (CDTD) and Youth Alive Kenya (YAK) are implementing a 6-year project titled Time to Care (TTC) in Nairobi, Mombasa, Kiambu and Nakuru counties in Kenya. The project’s Ultimate Outcome is to ‘Improve gender equality and care infrastructure for women and girls in Kenya.’
TTC will directly benefit 5,916 people and 2,021,800 people indirectly. These include both rural and urban populations, in particular small-scale farmers, women-headed households, unemployed and vulnerable men indirectly as shown in the table below:
The project has a two-pillar strategy representing two Intermediate Outcomes:
The projects Theory of Change builds on Oxfam’s understanding that local CSOs, especially WROs, are key agents in determining the direction of change in their societies. TTC’s design includes the voices of relevant stakeholders and is based on our gender analysis, as well as environmental and human rights considerations and developed in consultation with KIPs with close relationships with the people we work with. This consultation process confirmed that to achieve TTC’s Ultimate Outcome it is necessary to focus on changing social norms currently based on unequal gender and power relations, thereby advancing the implementation of care infrastructure supports and services in Kenya.
To ensure the project management processes within Time to Care reflect a feminist approach, the project is informed by Oxfam Canada’s feminist principles outlined in our broader Theory of Change for the project.
The MTR will be conducted during the fourth year of project implementation from May – June 2026. The baseline was conducted in 2023. A final evaluation will be conducted at the end of the project.
This MTR will focus on collective learning for possible adaptable measures for the remainder of the project. Specifically, the consultant will be expected to capture early project impacts, assess progress made on the project Intermediate and Immediate Outcomes listed above, identify project successes and challenges (including unanticipated outcomes/results), and adaptations.
The intended primary users of the MTR are the target project participants including women domestic workers, domestic worker groups, domestic worker rights network, employers, and influencers, implementing partners, Oxfam Kenya (OKE), and Oxfam Canada (OCA). MTR findings will be disseminated with all project stakeholders, including donor.
Women and girls in Kenya disproportionately shoulder unpaid care and domestic work (UCDW), while paid care work—especially domestic work—often remains undervalued and precarious, with gaps in protection and enforcement.
TTC responds to these issues through a combined approach of social norms change, capacity strengthening, coalition-building, and influencing advanced decent work and care-supportive systems.
A Mid-Term Evaluation (MTE) is scheduled for early Year 4 (2026/27) May – June 2026 to assess progress, identify learning, and guide adaptive management for the remainder of the project.
The MTE aims to:
(i) assess progress toward and on Intermediate and Immediate Outcomes by establishing the relevant indicator values as per the project Performance Measurement Framework (PMF).
(ii) evaluate effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence, and sustainability potential; and
(iii) identify lessons and inform adjustments for Years 4–6.
The MTR will be designed and implemented based on Oxfam’s feminist foundations for Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability, and Learning (FMEAL)[1]. FMEAL is based on the logic that transforming inequitable power and gender dynamics is complex and does not happen in a linear fashion. In that sense, it challenges us to think differently and innovatively about what constitutes evidence, expands the boundaries of collecting data, questions who gives meaning and power to knowledge, gender leadership and promotes social transformation. As such, we prioritize the following seven key foundations to FMEAL:
The MTR will focus on 4 out of 6 OECD/DAC Review criteria[2]: Effectiveness, Relevance, Coherence, and Efficiency as explained in the table below.
|
Review Criteria |
Possible Learning Questions |
|
Effectiveness – is the intervention achieving its objectives? (The extent to which project objectives were achieved, or are expected to be achieved, considering their relative importance.) |
· What early progress has been made by Time to Care Project towards achieving intended results by partners? · What are some key challenges faced by the Time to Care project and partners in their journey towards supporting domestic workers, and improving social norms on domestic workers’ rights? And what are strategies adopted to address those challenges? Which unintended outcomes/results, if any, have arisen from those challenges and setbacks? · What progress has been made toward Immediate and Intermediate Outcomes by comparing mid-term indicator values to baseline values, and what explains progress or delays? · How effective are TTC’s social norms strategies (e.g., BCC, leadership engagement) in shifting attitudes, behaviours, and norms around care work? · How effective are capacity strengthening approaches for CSOs, unions, WROs, and SMEs?
|
|
Relevance – Is the intervention doing the right things? (The extent to which the intervention has adapted to remain relevant; the design is still appropriate given changed circumstances.)
|
· What are key examples of best practices adopted by the project to support core partners? What can be done differently? If project assumptions have changed, or new assumptions have emerged, how should strategies and project activities be adapted for the remaining duration of the project? · Does TTC remain responsive to stakeholder needs in target counties? · How well does TTC align with Kenya’s policy and socio-economic context? · How coherent is TTC with other sectors’ actors and initiatives?
|
|
Coherence – How well does the intervention fit? (The extent to which intervention is consistent with or adding value in the sector/ thematic area/ region, without duplicating effort.) |
· How has the Time to Care project contributed towards policy change in recognizing domestic work as formal profession? · To what extent has the project contributed towards building an evidence base on domestic workers’ experiences of gender-based violence? |
|
Efficiency – How well are the resources being used? (The extent to which the intervention is delivered or is likely to deliver in an economic and timely way.) |
· To what extent has Time to Care contributed to strengthening the capacity of domestic workers and domestic worker groups, considering budgetary constraints, and changes in context? · Are resources used efficiently, and do delivery modalities and partnership arrangements support timely, coordinated implementation?
|
DISSEMINATION STRATEGIES
|
Audience of MTR |
Use for MTR |
Dissemination strategy |
Knowledge products |
|
OKE and OCA |
Assessment of project progress (successes and challenges), and recommendations for adaptations for the remainder of the project |
- Validation workshop and presentation of final report |
Final report - All communication materials generated |
|
Project Partners |
Improve organizational work (strategies to mitigate challenges), and determine future course of actions based on identified successes and lessons learnt |
- Validation workshop and presentation of final report |
- Final report - Easy to share brochure (2 pager) with MTR highlights. - Short ppt |
|
Community Members i.e. couples and male engagement |
Provide feedback on how project activities have supported them, and what areas do they need further support in |
- Validation workshop and presentation of final report |
- Easy to share brochure (2 pager i.e. one for couples and onemen) with MTR highlights. (Swahili & English) - |
|
COP of Employers and Domestic Workers |
Provide feedback on how project activities have supported them, and what areas do they need further support in |
- Validation workshop and presentation of final report |
- Easy to share brochure (2 pager i.e. one for DWs, one for COPs/Employers) with MTR highlights. (Swahili & English) - Impact Stories |
|
Employers |
Highlight trends on changes in perception and behaviour starting to occur in communities regarding domestic work |
- Validation workshop and presentation of final report |
- Easy to share brochure (2 pager) with MTR highlights. (Swahili & English) - Impact Stories |
|
Influencers |
Use MTR findings to advocate for policy changes related to formalization of domestic work |
- Presentation of final report |
- Final report and any external facing communication materials - |
|
GAC (donor) |
GAC internally and communicate the effectiveness of the Time to Care Project |
- GAC specific briefing on the MTR findings - Presentation of final report |
- Final report and external facing communication materials |
The consultant will work collaboratively with Oxfam, project partners, and domestic worker representatives to collectively determine what knowledge to collect, how it should be collected, and how knowledge and learnings will be analyzed and used. The consultant will adopt the GACs Results Based Framework/ Management [3]approach in the reporting and sharing the findings.
The consultant will collect and analyze qualitative and quantitative data, primary and secondary information, including facilitate reflection and validation workshops with all core partners and relevant stakeholders. Findings from this review will be used to contribute to collective learning with lessons learned and best practices in strengthening the agency of women domestic workers and improving social norms on the rights and entitlements of domestic workers in the wider society. This work must take into consideration the social, political, cultural, ethnic, economic context.
These will be in-depth interviews with key informants, including but not limited to influencers such as policy makers, political, religious, and community leaders, journalists, government and law enforcement officials, and NGO representatives to collect information about their perspectives domestic workers’ rights, especially their rights to decent work and life free from violence. Key guiding questions will be used to collect the information from the informants.
The goal of the FGDs will be to collect data on domestic workers’ and employers’ perspectives, level of knowledge and awareness on domestic workers’ rights (including their right to decent work and life free from violence). A minimum of 3-5 participants need to participate in each FGD (at max, eight participants per FGD).
Personal stories are first person personal narratives collected from women domestic workers about their experience working in this sector. The objective of the personal stories is to collect personal, first-person account of the enjoyment and/or violation of domestic worker rights with ILOs decent work categories: employment opportunity, right at work, social protection, and social dialogue. Particular attention will be given to capture data regarding women domestic workers experience with any form of violence, taking note of their actions, motivations and perceptions post these experiences. For this data collection, matured female and high trained data collector will have to be assigned who are aware of ethical and safe data collection practices.
The data collection tools will be co-designed by the consultant with support from project partners and Oxfam. Once a consultant has been selected, relevant project documents, reports and other resources will be provided as part of the inception meeting for better planning, draft tools development and inception period preparation. All data, collected through the study will be disaggregated by age, sex, disabilities and others where applicable. Prior to primary data collection, all tools will be translated into Swahili and pre-tested together with relevant project participants. Tools will be finalized post pre-testing.
List of key data points for each stakeholder group
|
Key Stakeholders |
Key data points |
|
Domestic workers and domestic worker group leaders |
· Demographic profile · Changes in their occupational skills · Self-confidence and their ability to advocate for their rights. · Knowledge on domestic worker rights and entitlements · Attitudes, norms and behaviour on domestic workers’ rights and entitlements, including recognition of domestic work as formal profession. · Experiences of violence (in workplace and at home) · Experience with domestic worker employment, including online job placement platforms. · Care work · Awareness of relevant policies · Relevant results from Year 3 surveys |
|
Employers[4] |
· Demographic profile · Socio economic status of the household · Knowledge on domestic worker rights and entitlements · Attitudes, norms and behaviour on domestic workers’ rights and entitlements, including recognition of domestic work as a formal profession. · Examples of good practices in place for domestic workers · Nature of domestic worker employment/care work · Demand assessment, including using online platforms for hiring domestic workers. · In-depth awareness of relevant policies · Relevant results from Year 3 surveys |
|
unpaid care workers (women, men, couples)
|
· Demographic profile · Socio economic status of the household · Knowledge on couples’ rights and entitlements regarding care work · Knowledge on the 5Rs framework on care work · In-depth awareness of relevant policies · Examples of good practices in place for care work at home
|
|
Influencers[5] |
· Demographic profile · Attitudes, norms and behaviour on domestic workers’ rights and entitlements, including recognition of domestic work as formal profession. · Changes observed in perceptions and behaviours related to recognition of domestic workers rights in their communities. · Challenges in bringing about changes in attitudes and perceptions on domestic workers’ rights and entitlements in the wider community. · Joint action plans developed by civil society for advocacy |
|
TTC Project Partners |
· Progress on their respective project targets · Challenges in implementation · Best Practices in place |
All data collected (desk review as well as qualitative data collected through primary data collection) will be analysed by the consultant. In the inception phase, consultants will be expected to produce an inception report with partial desk review completed, translated tools, data collection plan with timeline
and RACI chart[6], data analysis plan[7] as well as proposed table of contents for the final report (including list of annexes). Consultant will be responsible for triangulating the qualitative data from Year 3. Once the Inception Report is reviewed by Oxfam and all comments addressed, the consultant will be able to begin preparation for the next steps of the review.
Consultant will be responsible for validating the data collected with project stakeholders in a sense-making data validation workshop. The feedback provided by the participants will be incorporated and addressed in the final version of the MTR report.
Based on the feedback post validation, the consultant will be required to submit the draft narrative report (with all annexures) within 7 days from the end of the validation workshop. Oxfam will have 10 days to review the report and provide consolidated feedback to the consultant. The final report with final versions of the annexures will be due on a pre-determined agreed upon deadline. The consultant will adopt the GACs policy on Result Based Monitoring [8]Approach on report generation.
It should be noted that the selected consultant will be responsible for submitting quality report that is in line with the agreed Table of Contents, inclusive of analysed data and all agreed upon annexures. Failure to meet submit quality report may result in termination and/or non-payment.
Dissemination
Once the final MTR report has been submitted, the consultant will be expected to provide a presentation on the MTR findings to an external audience, that will be include various project stakeholders, including donors.
The required deliveries of this consultancy will be as follows:
Timeline and Deliverables (on 1 May 2026 – 31st June 2026)
|
Dates |
Expected number of days |
Task |
|
|
|
Start Date |
|
TBD |
Day 1-5 |
1. Signing contract 2. Documents and literature review 3. Develop and share inception report with the following: · desk review completed · completed media monitoring analysis. · field data collection plan for the qualitative data collection, · data analysis plan for qualitative data collection · enumerators training plan |
|
TBD |
Day 6-8 |
4. Oxfam to review and provide feedback on inception report |
|
TBD |
Day 9-13 |
5. Preparation of tools/questionnaire/guidelines · Oxfam will provide templates for qualitative tools (KII, FGD, personal story/impact stories) · Oxfam provides Table of Contents for: · Full Report |
|
TBD |
Day 14-18 |
6. Review tools and provide feedback |
|
TBD |
Day 19-20 |
7. Finalization of tools · Consultant completes pilot testing of tools. · Consultant to finalize all tools post-trial |
|
TBD |
Day 21 |
8. Organize training for data enumerators |
|
TBD |
Day 22-31 |
9. Data Collection (Qualitative and Quantitative – Mixed methods approach) |
|
TBD |
Day 32-36 |
10. Data cleaning, processing, and analysis |
|
TBD |
Day 37-38 |
11. Triangulation of analysed data with the with Year 3 annual survey data |
|
TBD |
Day 39-40 |
12. Consultant to share presentation with findings for the Validation workshop with Oxfam |
|
TBD |
Day 41 |
13. Data Validation/ Reflection workshop |
|
TBD |
Day 42-46 |
14. Consultant to submit draft report (based on agreed upon table of contents to be provided by Oxfam) and all agreed upon annexures |
|
TBD |
Day 47-56 |
15. Oxfam to review the report and provide one set of consolidated feedback to the consultant (within ten working days) |
|
TBD |
Day 57-60 |
16. Consultants submit the final MTR report |
|
TBD |
Day 61-62 |
17. Mid-term Review summary report |
|
TBD |
Day 63 |
18. Consultant to provide an external presentation (PPT) on the final report findings for various project stakeholders |
[11]Revised number of days for this assignment will be 63 days (approx) including weekend and holidays.
Confidentiality of information: All documents and data collected will be treated as confidential and used solely to facilitate analysis. Interviewees will not be quoted in the reports without their permission.
The provision of the Services is to commence in May 2026 and end by June 2026 unless this Agreement is terminated early in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
Oxfam Kenya is looking for a consultant/agency with a strong record in conducting innovative and participatory evaluation/review processes. In the case of individual consultant, the consultant must also demonstrate their ability to recruit experienced enumerators. The successful consultant/agency must be able to demonstrate the following skills and experiences:
Oxfam Kenya would follow the Oxfam International Evaluation Policy guideline. The guideline compasses an ethical standard, sharing of the evaluation publicly along with the management action taken report. The detailed ethics standard would be part of the contract which the evaluator has to commit to adhere as part of the assignment.
Ethical considerations for research on gender-based violence: There are additional ethical and methodological challenges when conducting research on sensitive issues such as gender-based violence or violence against women and girls. The nature of the subject means that issues of safety, confidentiality, interviewer skill, and training are even more important than for other areas of research. The physical safety and the psychological well-being of both respondents and the research team can be put in jeopardy if adequate precautions are not taken. Therefore, in addition to using Oxfam International Evaluation Policy guideline, this review will ensure it is undertaken in adherence with the World Health Organization (WHO) Putting Women First: Ethical and Safety Recommendations for Research on Domestic Violence Against Women” guidelines.
When the start of any type of primary data collection, it is paramount that confidentiality is maintained. Confidentiality is defined by WHO has “an explicit or implicit guarantee by the researcher to the participant that the information disclosed by the participant will only be disseminated in ways consistent with their original understanding.”
Other documents to be submitted:
For Individual Consultant
When using this weighted scoring method, the award of the contract should be made to the individual consultant whose offer has been evaluated and determined as:
* Technical Criteria weight: [80%]
* Financial Criteria weight: [20%]
|
Criteria |
Weight (%) |
|
Technical |
80% |
|
· Criteria A: Understanding of the ToR |
10 |
|
20 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
Financial |
20% |
You undertake that you, your parent, subsidiaries, and any other organisations with an interest of more than 10%, are not involved in any of the following activities:
[1] Annex 3: Oxfam Guidance Note on Feminist MEAL Principles
[2] https://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/revised-evaluation-criteria-dec-2019.pdf
[3] https://www.international.gc.ca/world-monde/funding-financement/assistance_results_guide_partners-guide_resultats_aide_partenaires.aspx?lang=eng
[4] Employers: Any person/persons who primarily manages DWs within the household.
[5] Influencers: These groups will refer to policy makers, political, religious and community leaders, prominent members of the society yielding influence, including journalists, government and law enforcement officials, NGO representatives and so on.
[6] RACI is a responsibility assignment matrix stands for responsible, accountable, consulted and informed. The selected consultant will have to include a RACI chart as part of the inception report and should also include Oxfam staff where needed.
[7] It should be noted that sex and age disaggregated data will be required for all data points. Furthermore, for a select number of key data points, zone-wise disaggregation may also be needed (that includes sex and age disaggregated data).
[8] https://www.international.gc.ca/world-monde/funding-financement/results_based_management-gestion_axee_resultats.aspx?lang=eng
[9] Workplan must include tools preparation, translation, pre-testing, and finalization.
[10] All literature reviewed and all documents cited should be included in the Bibliography. The bibliography should be in the following format:
Author’s last name, author’s first name (year) Report Title in Italics. Oxfam affiliate, month of report.
In addition, all references for the literature review should also be included as footnotes within the body of the document.
[11] Required timeline and deliverables
How to apply:
Oxfam Kenya invites individuals who meet the criteria to submit Expression of Interest that clearly articulates the consultant(s) understanding of the terms of reference, methodology for executing the work including key deliverables and tentative budget should and clearly indicated “Consultancy Services to conduct Oxfam Kenya TTC Project Mid Term Review”.
Expression of Interests shall be sent to Kenya.logs@oxfam.org.uk , no later than close of business on 27th of March 2026. Only applicants who qualify will be contacted.
Oxfam is committed to preventing any type of unwanted behaviour at work including sexual harassment, exploitation and abuse, lack of integrity and financial misconduct; and committed to promoting the welfare of children, young people, adults and beneficiaries with whom Oxfam GB engages. Oxfam expects all staff and volunteers to share this commitment through our code of conduct. We place a high priority on ensuring that only those who share and demonstrate our values are recruited to work for us.
The post holder will undertake the appropriate level of training and is responsible for ensuring that they understand and work within the safeguarding policies of the organisation.
All offers of employment will be subject to satisfactory references and appropriate screening checks, which can include criminal records and terrorism finance checks. Oxfam GB also participates in the Inter Agency Misconduct Disclosure Scheme. In line with this Scheme, we will request information from job applicants’ previous employers about any findings of sexual exploitation, sexual abuse and/or sexual harassment during employment, or incidents under investigation when the applicant left employment. By submitting an application, the job applicant confirms his/her understanding of these recruitment procedures.
We are committed to ensuring diversity and gender equality within our organisation and encourage applicants from diverse backgrounds to apply.
Oxfam is a global community who believe poverty isn’t inevitable. It’s an injustice that can be overcome. We are shop volunteers, women’s right activists, marathon runners, aid workers, coffee farmers, street fundraisers, goat herders, policy experts, campaigners, water engineers and more. And we won’t stop until everyone can live life without poverty for good.
Oxfam GB is a member of international confederation of 21 organisations working together with partners and local communities in the areas of humanitarian, development and campaigning, in more than 90 countries.
A thriving diverse Oxfam:
It’s people power that brings about change. To play our part as a global organisation working to overcome poverty and inequality, we need equality, diversity and inclusion across our community of staff, partners and volunteers. Together, we’re committed to becoming a more diverse workforce, better able to tackle the global challenges that face our world today.
To do that:
Subscribe & get all related jobs notification
© 2026 Oxfam